From 864d39899946930cb726d93b1a47a1e61eab5a26 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Bex <peter@more-magic.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 21:27:20 +0100
Subject: No need to flush, if we actually _call_ the close method instead of
 just referring to it

---
 egg-author.py | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/egg-author.py b/egg-author.py
index e8d58c1..8155c50 100644
--- a/egg-author.py
+++ b/egg-author.py
@@ -178,8 +178,7 @@ def update_meta(ui, repo):
     # reopen and write out the new string
     mf = repo.wfile(meta_file, 'w')
     mf.write(s)
-    mf.flush()
-    mf.close
+    mf.close()
 
     # Let the user know the file has been updated (or not, if unchanged)
     if len(repo.status(match=matchmod.exact('.', '.', [meta_file]))[0]) == 0:
-- 
cgit v1.2.3