1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
|
#;(include "../scsh-process.scm")
(use scsh-process)
(use test posix srfi-13 srfi-18 (only setup-api version>=?))
(test-begin "scsh-process")
(test-group "Procedural interface"
(test "Fork/pipe \"hello world\" example from SCSH reference manual"
'(0 #t "Hello, world.")
(receive (exit-status exited-ok? pid)
(wait (fork/pipe
(lambda ()
(with-output-to-port (open-output-file* 1)
(lambda () (display "Hello, world.\n"))))))
(list exit-status exited-ok? (read-line (open-input-file* 0)))))
(test "run/string* returns a string output in a subprocess"
"This is a test"
(run/string* (lambda () (display "This is a test"))))
;; Ensure all processes up to here have been reaped
(handle-exceptions exn (void) (let lp () (when (wait #f) (lp))))
;; We must mask sigchld, because otherwise our next (wait #f) will
;; fail due to scsh-process' signal handler possibly reaping the
;; child before our wait is able to do so.
(signal-mask! signal/chld)
(test "wait for next process to exit"
'(#t #t #t)
(let ((p (& (sleep 1))))
(receive (status ok? pid) (wait #f)
(receive (status2 ok?2 pid2) (wait p)
(list (eq? status status2) (eq? ok? ok?2) (or (eq? pid pid2) (list pid pid2)))))))
(test-assert "signal wasn't unmasked" (signal-masked? signal/chld))
(test "sigchld is masked inside child process"
"yes"
(run/string*
(lambda ()
(display (if (signal-masked? signal/chld) "yes" "no")))))
(signal-unmask! signal/chld)
(test "after unmasking, sigchld is also unmasked inside child process"
"yes"
(run/string*
(lambda ()
(display (if (signal-masked? signal/chld) "no" "yes")))))
;; Reported by Haochi Kiang
(test "run/string* does not redirect stderr"
'("This should go to stdout" "")
(let* ((strerr (open-output-string))
(ignored-output ; Collected in child process
(with-error-output-to-port
strerr
(lambda ()
(run/string*
(lambda ()
(display "This should go to stdout")
;; This doesn't end up in the parent process'
;; buffer because the memory isn't shared.
(display "This should go to stderr"
(current-error-port))))))))
(list ignored-output (get-output-string strerr))))
(test-error "run*/string* raises error if subprocess has nonzero exit status"
(run*/string* (lambda () (display "ohai") (exit 1)))))
(test-group "Macro (EPF) interface"
(delete-file* "outfile") ; Leftovers from last run
(test-group "Various run/... forms"
(test "Simple run/string"
"hi, there\n"
(run/string (echo "hi, there")))
;; Reported by Haochi Kiang
(test "Simple run/string with output to stderr"
""
;; TODO: Find some way so this doesn't pollute the actual
;; process's stderr
(run/string (sh -c "echo 'hi, there' >&2")))
;; Reported by Diego "dieggsy"
(test "Simple run/string and stderr dup()ed to stdout"
"hi, there\n"
(run/string (sh -c "echo 'hi, there' >&2") (= 2 1)))
(test "Unquote-splicing run/string"
"hi, there\n"
(run/string (echo ,@(list "hi," "there"))))
(test "Simple run/sexp"
'("hi, there")
(run/sexp (echo "(\"hi, there\") trailing stuff is ignored")))
(test "Simple run/sexps"
'(("hi, there") (a b c))
(run/sexps (echo "(\"hi, there\") (a b c)")))
(test "Simple run/port"
'(a b c)
(read (run/port (echo "(a b c)"))))
(let ((tmpfile (run/file (echo "blah"))))
(test "Simple run/file"
"blah\n"
(with-input-from-file tmpfile read-all))
(test "Appending to a file"
'("blah" "foo")
(begin (run (echo foo) (>> ,tmpfile))
(read-lines tmpfile)))
(let ((message "testing, 1 2 3"))
(test "Redirecting from object"
`("blah" "foo" ,(string-delete #\t message))
(run/strings (pipe (epf (tr -d t) (<< ,message))
(cat ,tmpfile -)))))
(delete-file* tmpfile)))
(test-group "Subprocesses"
(test "run/string with begin form"
"hi, there\n"
(run/string (pipe (begin (print "hi, there")) (cat))))
(when (version>=? (chicken-version) "4.8.1")
(let ((child? #f))
(thread-start! (lambda ()
(thread-sleep! 0.5)
(when child? (print "haihai"))))
(test "Simple 'begin' form with threading"
"hi, there\n"
(run/string (pipe (begin (set! child? #t)
(thread-sleep! 1)
(print "hi, there"))
(cat))))))
(let ((the-outfile "outfile"))
(test "Subprocess writing to a file"
"hi, there\n"
(begin (run (echo "hi, there") (> ,the-outfile))
(read-all the-outfile))))
(delete-file* "outfile")
(let ((echo-command 'echo))
(test "Subprocess piped to another process, writing to a file"
"1235\n"
(begin (run (pipe (,echo-command "1234" + 1)
("sh" -c "read foo; echo $(($foo))"))
(> outfile))
(read-all "outfile"))))
(delete-file* "outfile")
;; Reported by Haochi Kiang
(test "Output redirection with pipe ignores stderr"
""
;; TODO: Find some way so this doesn't pollute the actual
;; process's stderr
(run/string (pipe (sh -c "echo foo >&2") (cat))))
(test "Nested output redirection with pipe+"
"foo\n"
(run/string (pipe+ ((1 0))
(pipe+ ((2 0)) (sh -c "echo foo >&2") (cat))
(cat))))
(test "Collecting FDs"
(list 0 "foo\n" "bar\n")
(receive (status port1 port2)
(run/collecting (2 1) (sh -c "echo foo >&2; echo bar"))
(list status (read-all port1) (read-all port2)))))
(test-group "Conditional process sequencing forms"
(test "&& runs for all true values"
(list #t "bar\n")
(list (&& (epf (echo "foo") (> outfile))
(true)
(epf (echo "bar") (> outfile)))
(read-all "outfile")))
(delete-file* "outfile")
(test "&& stops at first false value and returns false"
(list #f "foo\n")
(list (&& (epf (echo "foo") (> outfile))
(false)
(epf (echo "bar") (> outfile)))
(read-all "outfile")))
(delete-file* "outfile")
(test "|| stops at first true value and returns true"
(list #t "foo\n")
(list (|| (epf (echo "foo") (> outfile))
(true)
(epf (echo "bar") (> outfile)))
(read-all "outfile")))
(delete-file* "outfile")
(test "|| continues after first false value and returns true"
(list #t "bar\n")
(list (|| (false)
(epf (echo "bar") (> outfile)))
(read-all "outfile")))
(delete-file* "outfile")
(test "|| continues beyond all false values and returns false"
#f
(|| (false) (epf (sh -c "echo hi && false") (- 1))))))
(test-group "finalization"
;; TODO: Find a way to test that the input port didn't get replaced by
;; one from a subshell. This happened before, but not sure how
;; to detect this except running it manually from the REPL.
(test-error "No more zombies lying around after we're done" (wait)))
(test-end)
(test-exit)
|
